Saturday, January 12, 2013

Jake Hamilton, Samuel L Jackson, and the Interracial Discussion of Race


            In the mild controversy surrounding Django Unchained’s release, one particular event caught my eye. Houston’s Jake Hamilton was interviewing the cast and crew, asking the typical sort of questions about the film’s content and production to Quentin Tarantino, Jamie Foxx and Kerry Washington, and Christoph Waltz respectively. Last, but certainly not least, came Samuel L Jackson, looking immaculately young and chiseled—how the fuck is he 64?—in a Jackie Brown hat and stylish glasses. Having had history with Tarantino’s treatment of race and the controversies that have surrounded it since the “Dead Nigger Storage” scene in Pulp Fiction, along with a clear investment in the struggle against racism—Jackson was affiliated with the black power movement in the late 60’s—, it only seemed natural that Hamilton would begin with a question on the film’s treatment of race.
            “There’s been a lot of controversy surrounding the usage of the N-Word in this movie and…”
            “’No?’ ‘Nobody?’ ‘None?’” Jackson broke in with deadpan inquisitiveness, “The word would be?”
            “I don’t want to say it” Hamilton muttered softly through the fading smile of a child
            “Why not?”
            “I don’t like to say it”
            Jackson paused thoughtfully for a brief moment, realizing the trap that Hamilton had walked into “Have you ever said it?”
            “No, sir”
            “Try it”
            “I don’t like to say it”
            “TRY IT”
            “Really? Seriously” Hamilton said, smiling with embarrassment and looking to his sides for help
            “We’re not going to have this conversation unless you say it”
            “…”
            “Do you wanna move on to another question?”
            “Yes! Awesome!”
            Jackson immediately broke out laughing in loud, pronounced syllables, easing the tension.
            Just when they seemed to have sailed on to clearer waters, Hamilton decided that the most prudent thing to do would be to remind Jackson, once again, that he did not like saying the word. This started a second round of back and forths that finally ended with Hamilton retreating from his question and saying “Sorry guys, it would’ve been a great question” to which Jackson replied “It wasn’t a great question if you can’t say the word”
            Watching the interview unfold, I was reminded of maybe a half dozen encounters that I’ve had with black acquaintances where the subject of race was brought up. In each case, upon seeing my obvious discomfort and quietness, they would laugh good-naturedly and say something along the lines of “Don’t worry so much. I love it when white people just be honest and real about race”.
            In theory, I agree with the mindset of Jackson and those black acquaintances. The whitewashing of our psychological truths only hinders a discourse that could move us forward as a culture. As Lenny Bruce argued, let’s use and diffuse these taboo words and subjects. Don’t sit there and pretend that the word “nigger” has never passed through your lips. There probably isn’t a man alive, white or black, which hasn’t said it in one context or another. In pretending otherwise you only obscure the sight of that you wish to combat. Racism in America is a monster, but how can we fight a monster in the dark?
            That is what I believe. How I actually act is a different story entirely. Upon hearing the laments for honesty in regard to a white person’s perspective on race, I nod my head thoughtfully and agree, but I never say anything substantial or personal. This is because any person’s true feelings on the thorny and multifaceted subject or race are going to be conflicted and critical and self-doubting and occasionally negative and occasionally hurtful.
            This is the truth. I was once working at a youth center. Kids would come in and play basketball, and it was my job to keep everything in order and do general maintenance and whatnot. The youth center was located directly on the divide in between the city and a nice suburb. As it happened, there was a relatively even divide of white kids and black kids who came in. More often than not, the white kids were from the suburb, and more often than not, the black kids were from the city. One day these two kids, who happened to be black, started asking me about my sex life. When I told them that that was none of their business they started laughing and saying “what’re you, a faggot?” As I was righting up a report, one of my coworkers, a black man named Paul who was in his late 20’s came up to me. “What happened?” he asked. I told him and he shook his head, “Were they black?”
            I cringed “Yeah”
            He shook his head again “Figures. They don’t have any respect for authority”
            There was no self-hatred in his voice; it was a mere observation. He was saying what we both knew: that the black kids tended to be from the city, that the kids from the city tended to come from poorer homes, that due to the high rates of single parenting among lower income households—along with the resulting need for the single parent to spend more time at work—poorer kids tend to have less parental presence in their life, and that kids with less parental presence in their lives are less likely to respond well to authority figures in general. We both knew that America’s history of institutionalized racism coupled with declining rates of social mobility and working class opportunity since the 1960’s were the reasons blacks faced these problems at higher rates.
            Objectively I knew all of this. And yet each time I got called a faggot or a retard by a black kid in the gym I could feel something maneuvering past my intellect and sinking into my bones. I could hear a voice in my head going “aw shit” when I’d see a group of black kids enter the gym. I could feel a tinge of disdain for them on sight. This was in spite of the fact that most times I had had no previous interactions with the group in question, and had nothing to judge them on other than the color of their skin.
            Now, that sort of thinking is obviously an example of racism. But does that make me a racist? I don’t see myself as one, but then again who does? In the end it doesn’t matter, at least not in the context of a black acquaintance asking for me to be open and honest about race. What matters is perception.
            Tony Hoagland, one of my favorite living poets, once wrote a poem called The Change. Written in first person, it described an unnamed narrator’s emotions as he watched a professional tennis match between a small white girl and a big, brass black player with “some outrageous name like Vondella Aphrodite”. As the narrator watches the match he finds himself, almost against his will, rooting for the white girl and feeling threatened by the black player.
            Such a poem may have a voice of racism, but it is an example of what open honesty in regard to race actually looks like. If you don’t believe me, go into any Irish Bar on the night when they bring some white fighter up for a shot at the heavyweight title. You’ll see three-dozen middle class dads cheering at each punch landed against black flesh and wincing at the final sound of white meat hitting canvas.
            Of course, Hoagland’s poem was met with controversy—or as close as the world of 21st century poetry can come to mustering controversy—when the black poet Claudia Rankine decried the poem as racist. This is perhaps inevitable. And it is why I always find myself, in practice, going against what I believe in theory. Because even if a white person’s honesty does not voice racism, but rather a compassionate and fittingly conflicted perspective on race, there is always the chance that it will be misconstrued. That is not to say that black people are particularly likely to misconstrue a complex message; it is to say that a certain percentage of people, black and white alike, are shallow, hypocritical and unintelligent. And so, in offering what very well might be a totally non-racist, but unflinchingly honest perspective on race, there is always the possibility that it might be construed as racist. And if one were to make a habit of being open about race, it would be statistically inevitable that eventually one would hit upon one of those unintelligent people. It would be statistically inevitable that sooner or later someone would decry you as racist. And then your goose would be cooked. This is what all white people desperately fear—being deemed a racist. I proudly don the informal monikers of “dick”, “asshole”, and “shithead”, but even I would feel my stomach drop if I was ever deemed as “racist”.
            I realize that I sound somewhat callous right now in dissecting the dilemma that white people face. I am not trying to bemoan the problems that race causes for white people. Only an idiot would complain that race relations in America are particularly hard on white people. But realize this: if Hamilton had been open with Jackson and had said “yes, I have used the word ‘nigger’ in the past’”, perhaps his station boss would have respected his honesty and frankness, but then again maybe his boss would have gotten offended and fired him. So why would a white person be open and frank in that sort of situation? How could he be?
            Malcolm X once said something to the effect that the problem of racism will never end until the day when the white man and the black man can sit down together and speak openly and without fear of offending the other party. I believe that he was right. And I pray that that day comes. But I’m not gonna be the one to stick my neck on the line to bring it about.
            Are you?

No comments:

Post a Comment